Guatemala vs Iraq: Adjusted net savings per capita
Guatemala
422.8 current US$
in 2021
Iraq
446.51 current US$
in 2021
Guatemala rank
76th
Iraq rank
75th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Guatemala
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 446.51 current US$ against 422.8 current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 23.71 current US$.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iraq ahead.
Guatemala ranks 76th and Iraq ranks 75th of 159 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.92 current US$ | 583.66 current US$ | 530.74 current US$ | Iraq |
| 2010s | 91.56 current US$ | 847.16 current US$ | 755.6 current US$ | Iraq |
| 2020s | 393.43 current US$ | 290.4 current US$ | 103.03 current US$ | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Guatemala or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 446.51 current US$ against 422.8 current US$ in Guatemala as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Guatemala and Iraq?
- 23.71 current US$, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Iraq?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do Guatemala and Iraq rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 76th and Iraq ranks 75th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.