Finland vs Kuwait: Adjusted net savings per capita
Finland
6,134 current US$
in 2021
Kuwait
4,401 current US$
in 2019
Finland rank
16th
Kuwait rank
19th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Finland
- Kuwait
How they compare
Finland currently reports 6,134 current US$ against 4,401 current US$ in Kuwait, a difference of 1,733 current US$.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 16th and Kuwait ranks 19th of 159 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Kuwait in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,494 current US$ | 1,124 current US$ | 1,370 current US$ | Finland |
| 2000s | 5,867 current US$ | 11,060 current US$ | 5,194 current US$ | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 4,154 current US$ | 10,168 current US$ | 6,014 current US$ | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Finland or Kuwait?
- Finland, at 6,134 current US$ against 4,401 current US$ in Kuwait as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Finland and Kuwait?
- 1,733 current US$, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kuwait?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Kuwait rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Finland ranks 16th and Kuwait ranks 19th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.