El Salvador vs Zambia: Adjusted net savings per capita
El Salvador
240.23 current US$
in 2021
Zambia
208.78 current US$
in 2020
El Salvador rank
91st
Zambia rank
94th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- El Salvador
- Zambia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 240.23 current US$ against 208.78 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 31.45 current US$.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 91st and Zambia ranks 94th of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 183.52 current US$ | 229.89 current US$ | 46.37 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 322.71 current US$ | 208.78 current US$ | 113.93 current US$ | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, El Salvador or Zambia?
- El Salvador, at 240.23 current US$ against 208.78 current US$ in Zambia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between El Salvador and Zambia?
- 31.45 current US$, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zambia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do El Salvador and Zambia rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- El Salvador ranks 91st and Zambia ranks 94th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.