Ecuador vs Gambia: Adjusted net savings per capita
Ecuador
138.38 current US$
in 2021
Gambia
134.3 current US$
in 2021
Ecuador rank
104th
Gambia rank
105th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Gambia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 138.38 current US$ against 134.3 current US$ in Gambia, a difference of 4.08 current US$.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 104th and Gambia ranks 105th of 159 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45.43 current US$ | -56.81 current US$ | 102.24 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 82.44 current US$ | -78.31 current US$ | 160.75 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 371.8 current US$ | -65.25 current US$ | 437.04 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 235.78 current US$ | 93.01 current US$ | 142.77 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Ecuador or Gambia?
- Ecuador, at 138.38 current US$ against 134.3 current US$ in Gambia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Ecuador and Gambia?
- 4.08 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Gambia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and Gambia rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 104th and Gambia ranks 105th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.