Croatia vs Japan: Adjusted net savings per capita
Croatia
1,476 current US$
in 2021
Japan
1,449 current US$
in 2021
Croatia rank
42nd
Japan rank
43rd
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Croatia
- Japan
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1,476 current US$ against 1,449 current US$ in Japan, a difference of 27 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Japan ahead.
Croatia ranks 42nd and Japan ranks 43rd of 159 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 128.41 current US$ | 4,448 current US$ | 4,320 current US$ | Japan |
| 2000s | 498.13 current US$ | 2,840 current US$ | 2,342 current US$ | Japan |
| 2010s | 965.84 current US$ | 2,108 current US$ | 1,142 current US$ | Japan |
| 2020s | 1,234 current US$ | 1,704 current US$ | 469.95 current US$ | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Croatia or Japan?
- Croatia, at 1,476 current US$ against 1,449 current US$ in Japan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Croatia and Japan?
- 27 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Japan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Japan rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Croatia ranks 42nd and Japan ranks 43rd of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.