China vs Suriname: Adjusted net savings per capita
China
2,032 current US$
in 2021
Suriname
1,883 current US$
in 2010
China rank
35th
Suriname rank
37th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- China
- Suriname
How they compare
China currently reports 2,032 current US$ against 1,883 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 149 current US$.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
China ranks 35th and Suriname ranks 37th of 159 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 796.94 current US$ | 1,972 current US$ | 1,175 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1,169 current US$ | 1,883 current US$ | 713.31 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, China or Suriname?
- China, at 2,032 current US$ against 1,883 current US$ in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between China and Suriname?
- 149 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do China and Suriname rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- China ranks 35th and Suriname ranks 37th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.