Chile vs Congo: Adjusted net savings per capita
Chile
-572.84 current US$
in 2021
Congo
-523.13 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
154th
Congo rank
153rd
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Chile
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports -523.13 current US$ against -572.84 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 49.71 current US$.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 154th and Congo ranks 153rd of 158 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 402.03 current US$ | -309.26 current US$ | 711.29 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 596.63 current US$ | -398.68 current US$ | 995.3 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 1,273 current US$ | 13.3 current US$ | 1,260 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 566.59 current US$ | -523.13 current US$ | 1,090 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Chile or Congo?
- Congo, at -523.13 current US$ against -572.84 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Chile and Congo?
- 49.71 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Congo?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Congo rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Chile ranks 154th and Congo ranks 153rd of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.