Cambodia vs Tanzania: Adjusted net savings per capita
Cambodia
267.19 current US$
in 2021
Tanzania
266.53 current US$
in 2019
Cambodia rank
87th
Tanzania rank
88th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Cambodia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 267.19 current US$ against 266.53 current US$ in Tanzania, a difference of 0.66 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 87th and Tanzania ranks 88th of 159 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.25 current US$ | -19.76 current US$ | 25.01 current US$ | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 50.76 current US$ | 56.7 current US$ | 5.94 current US$ | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 152.99 current US$ | 118.79 current US$ | 34.21 current US$ | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Cambodia or Tanzania?
- Cambodia, at 267.19 current US$ against 266.53 current US$ in Tanzania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Cambodia and Tanzania?
- 0.66 current US$, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Tanzania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Cambodia ranks 87th and Tanzania ranks 88th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.