Burkina Faso vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted net savings per capita
Burkina Faso
55.7 current US$
in 2019
Uzbekistan
54.11 current US$
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
116th
Uzbekistan rank
117th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Burkina Faso
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 55.7 current US$ against 54.11 current US$ in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.59 current US$.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 116th and Uzbekistan ranks 117th of 159 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.42 current US$ | 80.57 current US$ | 77.15 current US$ | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 39.31 current US$ | 259.56 current US$ | 220.25 current US$ | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Burkina Faso or Uzbekistan?
- Burkina Faso, at 55.7 current US$ against 54.11 current US$ in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Burkina Faso and Uzbekistan?
- 1.59 current US$, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Uzbekistan rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Burkina Faso ranks 116th and Uzbekistan ranks 117th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.