Burkina Faso vs Lesotho: Adjusted net savings per capita
Burkina Faso
55.7 current US$
in 2019
Lesotho
64.34 current US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
116th
Lesotho rank
115th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Burkina Faso
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 64.34 current US$ against 55.7 current US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 8.64 current US$.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Lesotho ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 116th and Lesotho ranks 115th of 159 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.83 current US$ | 346.34 current US$ | 338.51 current US$ | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 39.31 current US$ | 87.79 current US$ | 48.47 current US$ | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Burkina Faso or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 64.34 current US$ against 55.7 current US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Burkina Faso and Lesotho?
- 8.64 current US$, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Lesotho?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Lesotho rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Burkina Faso ranks 116th and Lesotho ranks 115th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.