Burkina Faso vs Cyprus: Adjusted net savings per capita
Burkina Faso
55.7 current US$
in 2019
Cyprus
79.97 current US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
116th
Cyprus rank
113th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Burkina Faso
- Cyprus
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 79.97 current US$ against 55.7 current US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 24.27 current US$.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.4 times Burkina Faso's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 116th and Cyprus ranks 113th of 159 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.42 current US$ | 2,637 current US$ | 2,633 current US$ | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 39.31 current US$ | 1,608 current US$ | 1,569 current US$ | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Burkina Faso or Cyprus?
- Cyprus, at 79.97 current US$ against 55.7 current US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Burkina Faso and Cyprus?
- 24.27 current US$, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cyprus?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Cyprus rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Burkina Faso ranks 116th and Cyprus ranks 113th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.