Botswana vs Serbia: Adjusted net savings per capita
Botswana
547.24 current US$
in 2021
Serbia
502.12 current US$
in 2021
Botswana rank
69th
Serbia rank
71st
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Botswana
- Serbia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 547.24 current US$ against 502.12 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 45.12 current US$.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 71st of 159 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,094 current US$ | -176.81 current US$ | 1,271 current US$ | Botswana |
| 2010s | 1,263 current US$ | 25.21 current US$ | 1,238 current US$ | Botswana |
| 2020s | 515.84 current US$ | 461.07 current US$ | 54.77 current US$ | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Botswana or Serbia?
- Botswana, at 547.24 current US$ against 502.12 current US$ in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Botswana and Serbia?
- 45.12 current US$, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Serbia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Botswana and Serbia rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Botswana ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 71st of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.