Bhutan vs Cote d'Ivoire: Adjusted net savings per capita
Bhutan
409.36 current US$
in 2021
Cote d'Ivoire
421.79 current US$
in 2020
Bhutan rank
78th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
77th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 421.79 current US$ against 409.36 current US$ in Bhutan, a difference of 12.43 current US$.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 78th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 77th of 159 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Cote d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 420.06 current US$ | -325.89 current US$ | 745.95 current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 625.64 current US$ | 115.26 current US$ | 510.38 current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 515.57 current US$ | 421.79 current US$ | 93.78 current US$ | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Bhutan or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 421.79 current US$ against 409.36 current US$ in Bhutan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Bhutan and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 12.43 current US$, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Bhutan and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 78th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 77th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.