Belarus vs Gabon: Adjusted net savings per capita
Belarus
924.25 current US$
in 2021
Gabon
897.33 current US$
in 2015
Belarus rank
56th
Gabon rank
58th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Belarus
- Gabon
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 924.25 current US$ against 897.33 current US$ in Gabon, a difference of 26.92 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 56th and Gabon ranks 58th of 159 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.47 current US$ | -445.26 current US$ | 522.73 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2000s | 400.51 current US$ | -111.59 current US$ | 512.1 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,092 current US$ | 336.8 current US$ | 755.61 current US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Belarus or Gabon?
- Belarus, at 924.25 current US$ against 897.33 current US$ in Gabon as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Belarus and Gabon?
- 26.92 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Gabon?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2015.
- How do Belarus and Gabon rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Belarus ranks 56th and Gabon ranks 58th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.