Barbados vs Mongolia: Adjusted net savings per capita
Barbados
-468.85 current US$
in 2017
Mongolia
-315.16 current US$
in 2021
Barbados rank
153rd
Mongolia rank
151st
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Barbados
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -315.16 current US$ against -468.85 current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 153.69 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 153rd and Mongolia ranks 151st of 159 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 703.78 current US$ | 66 current US$ | 637.78 current US$ | Barbados |
| 2000s | 346.73 current US$ | 92.13 current US$ | 254.59 current US$ | Barbados |
| 2010s | -426.7 current US$ | 159.12 current US$ | 585.82 current US$ | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Barbados or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at -315.16 current US$ against -468.85 current US$ in Barbados as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Barbados and Mongolia?
- 153.69 current US$, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Mongolia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
- How do Barbados and Mongolia rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Barbados ranks 153rd and Mongolia ranks 151st of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.