Bahrain vs Poland: Adjusted net savings per capita
Bahrain
1,578 current US$
in 2018
Poland
1,858 current US$
in 2021
Bahrain rank
40th
Poland rank
38th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Bahrain
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 1,858 current US$ against 1,578 current US$ in Bahrain, a difference of 280 current US$.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Bahrain's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Poland ahead.
Bahrain ranks 40th and Poland ranks 38th of 159 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,217 current US$ | 315.68 current US$ | 1,533 current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 1,022 current US$ | 464.48 current US$ | 557.7 current US$ | Bahrain |
| 2010s | 1,224 current US$ | 1,082 current US$ | 141.55 current US$ | Bahrain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Bahrain or Poland?
- Poland, at 1,858 current US$ against 1,578 current US$ in Bahrain as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Bahrain and Poland?
- 280 current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Poland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
- How do Bahrain and Poland rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Bahrain ranks 40th and Poland ranks 38th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.