Bahrain vs Japan: Adjusted net savings per capita
Bahrain
1,578 current US$
in 2018
Japan
1,449 current US$
in 2021
Bahrain rank
40th
Japan rank
43rd
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Bahrain
- Japan
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 1,578 current US$ against 1,449 current US$ in Japan, a difference of 129 current US$.
That makes Bahrain's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Japan ahead.
Bahrain ranks 40th and Japan ranks 43rd of 159 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,332 current US$ | 4,448 current US$ | 5,780 current US$ | Japan |
| 2000s | 1,022 current US$ | 2,840 current US$ | 1,818 current US$ | Japan |
| 2010s | 1,224 current US$ | 2,032 current US$ | 808.59 current US$ | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Bahrain or Japan?
- Bahrain, at 1,578 current US$ against 1,449 current US$ in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Bahrain and Japan?
- 129 current US$, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Japan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Bahrain and Japan rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Bahrain ranks 40th and Japan ranks 43rd of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.