Austria vs Belgium: Adjusted net savings per capita
Austria
6,862 current US$
in 2021
Belgium
6,249 current US$
in 2021
Austria rank
13th
Belgium rank
15th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Austria
- Belgium
How they compare
Austria currently reports 6,862 current US$ against 6,249 current US$ in Belgium, a difference of 613 current US$.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belgium ahead.
Austria ranks 13th and Belgium ranks 15th of 159 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,655 current US$ | 6,014 current US$ | 641.43 current US$ | Austria |
| 2010s | 6,302 current US$ | 4,975 current US$ | 1,327 current US$ | Austria |
| 2020s | 6,629 current US$ | 5,523 current US$ | 1,106 current US$ | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Austria or Belgium?
- Austria, at 6,862 current US$ against 6,249 current US$ in Belgium as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Austria and Belgium?
- 613 current US$, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belgium?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do Austria and Belgium rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Austria ranks 13th and Belgium ranks 15th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.