Armenia vs Burkina Faso: Adjusted net savings per capita
Armenia
43.79 current US$
in 2021
Burkina Faso
55.7 current US$
in 2019
Armenia rank
119th
Burkina Faso rank
116th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Armenia
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 55.7 current US$ against 43.79 current US$ in Armenia, a difference of 11.91 current US$.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.3 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 119th and Burkina Faso ranks 116th of 159 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 353.41 current US$ | 3.42 current US$ | 349.99 current US$ | Armenia |
| 2010s | 48.16 current US$ | 39.31 current US$ | 8.84 current US$ | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Armenia or Burkina Faso?
- Burkina Faso, at 55.7 current US$ against 43.79 current US$ in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Armenia and Burkina Faso?
- 11.91 current US$, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Burkina Faso?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Burkina Faso rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Armenia ranks 119th and Burkina Faso ranks 116th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.