Angola vs Tanzania: Adjusted net savings per capita
Angola
241.15 current US$
in 2021
Tanzania
266.53 current US$
in 2019
Angola rank
90th
Tanzania rank
88th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Angola
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 266.53 current US$ against 241.15 current US$ in Angola, a difference of 25.38 current US$.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tanzania ahead.
Angola ranks 90th and Tanzania ranks 88th of 159 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -9.24 current US$ | 56.7 current US$ | 65.94 current US$ | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 108.23 current US$ | 118.79 current US$ | 10.56 current US$ | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Angola or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 266.53 current US$ against 241.15 current US$ in Angola as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Angola and Tanzania?
- 25.38 current US$, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Tanzania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Angola ranks 90th and Tanzania ranks 88th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.