Angola vs Nicaragua: Adjusted net savings per capita
Angola
241.15 current US$
in 2021
Nicaragua
230.83 current US$
in 2021
Angola rank
90th
Nicaragua rank
92nd
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Angola
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Angola currently reports 241.15 current US$ against 230.83 current US$ in Nicaragua, a difference of 10.32 current US$.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Angola ranks 90th and Nicaragua ranks 92nd of 159 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -9.24 current US$ | 69.45 current US$ | 78.69 current US$ | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 108.23 current US$ | 264.29 current US$ | 156.07 current US$ | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 186.82 current US$ | 266.27 current US$ | 79.45 current US$ | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Angola or Nicaragua?
- Angola, at 241.15 current US$ against 230.83 current US$ in Nicaragua as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Angola and Nicaragua?
- 10.32 current US$, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nicaragua?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Angola and Nicaragua rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Angola ranks 90th and Nicaragua ranks 92nd of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.