Angola vs Myanmar: Adjusted net savings per capita
Angola
241.15 current US$
in 2021
Myanmar
257.13 current US$
in 2019
Angola rank
90th
Myanmar rank
89th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Angola
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 257.13 current US$ against 241.15 current US$ in Angola, a difference of 15.98 current US$.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Myanmar ahead.
Angola ranks 90th and Myanmar ranks 89th of 159 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -54.31 current US$ | 9.78 current US$ | 64.09 current US$ | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 108.23 current US$ | 226.58 current US$ | 118.35 current US$ | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Angola or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 257.13 current US$ against 241.15 current US$ in Angola as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Angola and Myanmar?
- 15.98 current US$, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Myanmar?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Myanmar rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Angola ranks 90th and Myanmar ranks 89th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in World Bank's "The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" (2011), published as Adjusted net savings per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage.