Luxembourg vs Myanmar: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Luxembourg
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 13.64 billion current US$ against 12.16 billion current US$ in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.48 billion current US$.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 53rd and Myanmar ranks 51st of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.40 billion current US$ | 479.19 million current US$ | 923.75 million current US$ | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 7.46 billion current US$ | 11.61 billion current US$ | 4.16 billion current US$ | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Luxembourg or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 13.64 billion current US$ against 12.16 billion current US$ in Luxembourg as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Luxembourg and Myanmar?
- 1.48 billion current US$, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Myanmar?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Luxembourg and Myanmar rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Luxembourg ranks 53rd and Myanmar ranks 51st of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.