Libya vs Oman: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Libya
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports -8.49 billion current US$ against -13.77 billion current US$ in Libya, a difference of 5.28 billion current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 159th and Oman ranks 157th of 159 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.27 billion current US$ | -310.37 million current US$ | 14.58 billion current US$ | Libya |
| 2010s | 4.63 billion current US$ | -2.85 billion current US$ | 7.48 billion current US$ | Libya |
| 2020s | -13.77 billion current US$ | -6.21 billion current US$ | 7.55 billion current US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Libya or Oman?
- Oman, at -8.49 billion current US$ against -13.77 billion current US$ in Libya as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Libya and Oman?
- 5.28 billion current US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Oman?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Libya and Oman rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Libya ranks 159th and Oman ranks 157th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.