Latvia vs Suriname: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Latvia
- Suriname
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.20 billion current US$ against 1.03 billion current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 174.21 million current US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Suriname ahead.
Latvia ranks 98th and Suriname ranks 101st of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.30 billion current US$ | 1.05 billion current US$ | 254.44 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2010s | -4.82 million current US$ | 1.03 billion current US$ | 1.03 billion current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Latvia or Suriname?
- Latvia, at 1.20 billion current US$ against 1.03 billion current US$ in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Latvia and Suriname?
- 174.21 million current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Suriname rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Latvia ranks 98th and Suriname ranks 101st of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.