Latvia vs Maldives: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Latvia
- Maldives
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.20 billion current US$ against 1.13 billion current US$ in Maldives, a difference of 69.12 million current US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Maldives ahead.
Latvia ranks 98th and Maldives ranks 100th of 159 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 977.13 million current US$ | 521.68 million current US$ | 455.46 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.48 billion current US$ | 554.79 million current US$ | 928.85 million current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Latvia or Maldives?
- Latvia, at 1.20 billion current US$ against 1.13 billion current US$ in Maldives as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Latvia and Maldives?
- 69.12 million current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Maldives?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Maldives rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Latvia ranks 98th and Maldives ranks 100th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.