Kyrgyzstan vs Rwanda: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -162.44 million current US$ against -208.26 million current US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 45.83 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 132nd and Rwanda ranks 131st of 159 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 122.73 million current US$ | -279.65 million current US$ | 402.38 million current US$ | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 395.18 million current US$ | -291.22 million current US$ | 686.40 million current US$ | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Kyrgyzstan or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -162.44 million current US$ against -208.26 million current US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda?
- 45.83 million current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 132nd and Rwanda ranks 131st of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.