Kazakhstan vs Rwanda: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Kazakhstan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -162.44 million current US$ against -353.93 million current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 191.49 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 134th and Rwanda ranks 131st of 159 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.81 billion current US$ | -279.65 million current US$ | 14.09 billion current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 6.00 billion current US$ | -291.22 million current US$ | 6.29 billion current US$ | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Kazakhstan or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -162.44 million current US$ against -353.93 million current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
- 191.49 million current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Rwanda rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Kazakhstan ranks 134th and Rwanda ranks 131st of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.