Kazakhstan, Republic of vs Namibia: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage

Kazakhstan, Republic of
-353.93 million current US$
in 2021
Namibia
-221.47 million current US$
in 2021
Kazakhstan, Republic of rank
134th
Namibia rank
133rd

Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time

  • Kazakhstan, Republic of
  • Namibia
-10.0B010.0B20.0B199120062021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -221.47 million current US$ against -353.93 million current US$ in Kazakhstan, Republic of, a difference of 132.46 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 134th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan, Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan, Republic of Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s -2.59 billion current US$ 838.01 million current US$ 3.43 billion current US$ Namibia
2000s -1.25 billion current US$ 1.23 billion current US$ 2.48 billion current US$ Namibia
2010s 13.81 billion current US$ 1.12 billion current US$ 12.68 billion current US$ Kazakhstan, Republic of
2020s 6.00 billion current US$ 456.91 million current US$ 5.55 billion current US$ Kazakhstan, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Kazakhstan, Republic of or Namibia?
Namibia, at -221.47 million current US$ against -353.93 million current US$ in Kazakhstan, Republic of as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Kazakhstan, Republic of and Namibia?
132.46 million current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan, Republic of and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Kazakhstan, Republic of and Namibia rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 134th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan, Republic of vs Namibia: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-including-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/kazakhstan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-including-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/kazakhstan/namibia/">Kazakhstan, Republic of vs Namibia: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 4,079 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.