Guinea-Bissau vs Rwanda: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Rwanda
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports -53.78 million current US$ against -162.44 million current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 108.66 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Rwanda ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 131st of 159 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -163.98 million current US$ | -279.65 million current US$ | 115.67 million current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | -53.78 million current US$ | -420.00 million current US$ | 366.22 million current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Guinea-Bissau or Rwanda?
- Guinea-Bissau, at -53.78 million current US$ against -162.44 million current US$ in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda?
- 108.66 million current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 131st of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.