Burkina Faso vs Latvia: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Burkina Faso
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.20 billion current US$ against 1.17 billion current US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 35.25 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 98th of 159 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.51 million current US$ | 1.19 billion current US$ | 1.14 billion current US$ | Latvia |
| 2010s | 735.77 million current US$ | 776.73 million current US$ | 40.97 million current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Burkina Faso or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 1.20 billion current US$ against 1.17 billion current US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 35.25 million current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Latvia rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Burkina Faso ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 98th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.