Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Bhutan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 318.27 million current US$ against 305.90 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 12.37 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 159 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 271.97 million current US$ | -2.25 billion current US$ | 2.52 billion current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 461.82 million current US$ | -2.60 billion current US$ | 3.06 billion current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 398.28 million current US$ | 305.90 million current US$ | 92.38 million current US$ | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Bhutan or Zimbabwe?
- Bhutan, at 318.27 million current US$ against 305.90 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
- 12.37 million current US$, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Bhutan and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Bhutan ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.