Barbados vs Namibia: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Barbados
- Namibia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports -130.90 million current US$ against -221.47 million current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 90.57 million current US$.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 159 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 178.70 million current US$ | 795.40 million current US$ | 616.70 million current US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 93.01 million current US$ | 1.23 billion current US$ | 1.13 billion current US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | -118.33 million current US$ | 1.18 billion current US$ | 1.29 billion current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Barbados or Namibia?
- Barbados, at -130.90 million current US$ against -221.47 million current US$ in Namibia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Barbados and Namibia?
- 90.57 million current US$, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Namibia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
- How do Barbados and Namibia rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Barbados ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.