Angola vs Nepal: Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage over time
- Angola
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 8.91 billion current US$ against 8.32 billion current US$ in Angola, a difference of 589.90 million current US$.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Angola ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 58th of 159 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -208.68 million current US$ | 2.10 billion current US$ | 2.31 billion current US$ | Nepal |
| 2010s | 2.81 billion current US$ | 8.05 billion current US$ | 5.24 billion current US$ | Nepal |
| 2020s | 6.37 billion current US$ | 8.63 billion current US$ | 2.26 billion current US$ | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage, Angola or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 8.91 billion current US$ against 8.32 billion current US$ in Angola as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage between Angola and Nepal?
- 589.90 million current US$, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nepal?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Angola and Nepal rank globally for adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage?
- Angola ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 58th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide and particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.