Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage

Kyrgyzstan
-174.99 million current US$
in 2021
Namibia
-131.96 million current US$
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
140th
Namibia rank
139th

Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Namibia
-1.0B01.0B2.0B199120062021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -131.96 million current US$ against -174.99 million current US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 43.02 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Namibia ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 139th of 164 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s -210.83 million current US$ 831.32 million current US$ 1.04 billion current US$ Namibia
2000s 127.82 million current US$ 1.32 billion current US$ 1.19 billion current US$ Namibia
2010s 154.21 million current US$ 1.24 billion current US$ 1.08 billion current US$ Namibia
2020s 427.63 million current US$ 544.52 million current US$ 116.89 million current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
Namibia, at -131.96 million current US$ against -174.99 million current US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
43.02 million current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
25 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2021.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 139th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/kyrgyz-republic/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/kyrgyz-republic/namibia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
164 places, 4,212 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide. This series excludes particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.