Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage

Guinea-Bissau
-27.40 million current US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
-23.46 million current US$
in 2021
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th
Kazakhstan rank
134th

Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Kazakhstan
-10.0B010.0B20.0B199020052021

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports -23.46 million current US$ against -27.40 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 3.95 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Kazakhstan ranks 134th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s -48.34 million current US$ -2.27 billion current US$ 2.22 billion current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s -82.08 million current US$ -691.84 million current US$ 609.76 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s -138.15 million current US$ 14.20 billion current US$ 14.34 billion current US$ Kazakhstan
2020s -27.40 million current US$ 12.65 billion current US$ 12.68 billion current US$ Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage, Guinea-Bissau or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at -23.46 million current US$ against -27.40 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage between Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
3.95 million current US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan rank globally for adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Kazakhstan ranks 134th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/guinea-bissau/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/guinea-bissau/kazakhstan/">Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
164 places, 4,212 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide. This series excludes particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.