Burkina Faso vs Latvia: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage
Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage over time
- Burkina Faso
- Latvia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 1.54 billion current US$ against 1.25 billion current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 291.31 million current US$.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 97th and Latvia ranks 100th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 277.63 million current US$ | 1.26 billion current US$ | 983.96 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.07 billion current US$ | 821.20 million current US$ | 244.53 million current US$ | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage, Burkina Faso or Latvia?
- Burkina Faso, at 1.54 billion current US$ against 1.25 billion current US$ in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage between Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 291.31 million current US$, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Latvia rank globally for adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage?
- Burkina Faso ranks 97th and Latvia ranks 100th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide. This series excludes particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.