Barbados vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage

Barbados
-118.78 million current US$
in 2017
Guinea-Bissau
-27.40 million current US$
in 2020
Barbados rank
137th
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th

Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage over time

  • Barbados
  • Guinea-Bissau
-200.0M0200.0M400.0M199020052020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports -27.40 million current US$ against -118.78 million current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 91.38 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 137th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th of 164 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 196.03 million current US$ -39.33 million current US$ 235.37 million current US$ Barbados
2000s 97.04 million current US$ -82.08 million current US$ 179.12 million current US$ Barbados
2010s -107.22 million current US$ -166.29 million current US$ 59.07 million current US$ Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage, Barbados or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at -27.40 million current US$ against -118.78 million current US$ in Barbados as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage between Barbados and Guinea-Bissau?
91.38 million current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Guinea-Bissau?
25 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
How do Barbados and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage?
Barbados ranks 137th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/barbados/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/barbados/guinea-bissau/">Barbados vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
164 places, 4,212 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide. This series excludes particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.