Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage

Bahamas
518.98 million current US$
in 2021
Zimbabwe
659.91 million current US$
in 2020
Bahamas rank
109th
Zimbabwe rank
106th

Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zimbabwe
-4.0B-2.0B02.0B199020052021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 659.91 million current US$ against 518.98 million current US$ in Bahamas, a difference of 140.93 million current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 447.92 million current US$ 501.97 million current US$ 54.05 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 2.02 billion current US$ -2.06 billion current US$ 4.07 billion current US$ Bahamas
2010s 1.77 billion current US$ -2.29 billion current US$ 4.06 billion current US$ Bahamas
2020s 807.09 million current US$ 659.91 million current US$ 147.19 million current US$ Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage, Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 659.91 million current US$ against 518.98 million current US$ in Bahamas as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
140.93 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage?
Bahamas ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/">Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
164 places, 4,212 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide. This series excludes particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.