Aruba vs Eswatini: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage

Aruba
214.24 million current US$
in 2021
Eswatini
251.24 million current US$
in 2021
Aruba rank
120th
Eswatini rank
117th

Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage over time

  • Aruba
  • Eswatini
-500.0M-250.0M0250.0M500.0M199020052021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 251.24 million current US$ against 214.24 million current US$ in Aruba, a difference of 37.00 million current US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 117th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 278.41 million current US$ 35.32 million current US$ 243.09 million current US$ Aruba
2000s 121.19 million current US$ 262.95 million current US$ 141.76 million current US$ Eswatini
2010s 97.22 million current US$ 31.02 million current US$ 66.21 million current US$ Aruba
2020s 73.07 million current US$ 156.33 million current US$ 83.26 million current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage, Aruba or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 251.24 million current US$ against 214.24 million current US$ in Aruba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage between Aruba and Eswatini?
37.00 million current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Eswatini?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage?
Aruba ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 117th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Eswatini: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/aruba/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-savings-excluding-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/aruba/eswatini/">Aruba vs Eswatini: Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
164 places, 4,212 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide. This series excludes particulate emissions damage. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.