Lithuania vs Uruguay: Adjusted net national income per capita
Adjusted net national income per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 15,464 constant 2015 US$ against 15,046 constant 2015 US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 418 constant 2015 US$.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 37th and Uruguay ranks 36th of 151 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,243 constant 2015 US$ | 10,623 constant 2015 US$ | 6,380 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 7,755 constant 2015 US$ | 10,324 constant 2015 US$ | 2,569 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 11,862 constant 2015 US$ | 14,610 constant 2015 US$ | 2,749 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 14,888 constant 2015 US$ | 15,219 constant 2015 US$ | 330.8 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net national income per capita, Lithuania or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 15,464 constant 2015 US$ against 15,046 constant 2015 US$ in Lithuania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net national income per capita between Lithuania and Uruguay?
- 418 constant 2015 US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uruguay?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Lithuania and Uruguay rank globally for adjusted net national income per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 37th and Uruguay ranks 36th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net national income per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.