Latvia vs Oman: Adjusted net national income per capita
Adjusted net national income per capita over time
- Latvia
- Oman
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 13,539 constant 2015 US$ against 12,327 constant 2015 US$ in Oman, a difference of 1,212 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Oman ahead.
Latvia ranks 42nd and Oman ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,992 constant 2015 US$ | 6,712 constant 2015 US$ | 2,721 constant 2015 US$ | Oman |
| 2000s | 7,374 constant 2015 US$ | 9,135 constant 2015 US$ | 1,761 constant 2015 US$ | Oman |
| 2010s | 10,433 constant 2015 US$ | 12,778 constant 2015 US$ | 2,345 constant 2015 US$ | Oman |
| 2020s | 13,151 constant 2015 US$ | 12,513 constant 2015 US$ | 637.55 constant 2015 US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net national income per capita, Latvia or Oman?
- Latvia, at 13,539 constant 2015 US$ against 12,327 constant 2015 US$ in Oman as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net national income per capita between Latvia and Oman?
- 1,212 constant 2015 US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oman?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Oman rank globally for adjusted net national income per capita?
- Latvia ranks 42nd and Oman ranks 44th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net national income per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.