Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Adjusted net national income per capita
Adjusted net national income per capita over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2,478 constant 2015 US$ against 2,306 constant 2015 US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 172 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Eswatini ranks 102nd of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,263 constant 2015 US$ | 2,522 constant 2015 US$ | 740.71 constant 2015 US$ | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 2,172 constant 2015 US$ | 2,437 constant 2015 US$ | 265.51 constant 2015 US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net national income per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 2,478 constant 2015 US$ against 2,306 constant 2015 US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net national income per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
- 172 constant 2015 US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted net national income per capita?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Eswatini ranks 102nd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net national income per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.