Croatia vs Latvia: Adjusted net national income per capita
Adjusted net national income per capita over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 13,539 constant 2015 US$ against 12,580 constant 2015 US$ in Croatia, a difference of 959 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 43rd and Latvia ranks 42nd of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,269 constant 2015 US$ | 3,575 constant 2015 US$ | 2,694 constant 2015 US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 8,800 constant 2015 US$ | 7,374 constant 2015 US$ | 1,426 constant 2015 US$ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 10,368 constant 2015 US$ | 10,433 constant 2015 US$ | 65.33 constant 2015 US$ | Latvia |
| 2020s | 11,942 constant 2015 US$ | 13,151 constant 2015 US$ | 1,208 constant 2015 US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net national income per capita, Croatia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 13,539 constant 2015 US$ against 12,580 constant 2015 US$ in Croatia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net national income per capita between Croatia and Latvia?
- 959 constant 2015 US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for adjusted net national income per capita?
- Croatia ranks 43rd and Latvia ranks 42nd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net national income per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.