Denmark vs IBRD only: Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
8.61 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
IBRD only
378,040 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Denmark rank
16th
IBRD only rank
19th

Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • IBRD only
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M197019952021

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 8.61 million current US$ per square kilometre against 378,040 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 8.23 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 22.8 times IBRD only's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 16th and IBRD only ranks 19th of 183 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark IBRD only Difference Ahead
1970s 835,657 current US$ per square kilometre 15,874 current US$ per square kilometre 819,783 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 1.64 million current US$ per square kilometre 34,402 current US$ per square kilometre 1.61 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 3.30 million current US$ per square kilometre 54,440 current US$ per square kilometre 3.25 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 5.14 million current US$ per square kilometre 115,302 current US$ per square kilometre 5.02 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 7.09 million current US$ per square kilometre 293,335 current US$ per square kilometre 6.80 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 8.11 million current US$ per square kilometre 352,056 current US$ per square kilometre 7.76 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or IBRD only?
Denmark, at 8.61 million current US$ per square kilometre against 378,040 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and IBRD only?
8.23 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and IBRD only?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Denmark and IBRD only rank globally for adjusted net national income (current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 16th and IBRD only ranks 19th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs IBRD only: Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ibrd-only/">Denmark vs IBRD only: Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 9,442 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.