Central Europe and the Baltics vs Luxembourg: Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Luxembourg
19.34 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
4th
Luxembourg rank
4th

Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Luxembourg
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199320072021

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 19.34 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 17.94 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 13.9 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 4th of 47 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 639,378 current US$ per square kilometre 10.46 million current US$ per square kilometre 9.82 million current US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2010s 1.05 million current US$ per square kilometre 14.54 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.49 million current US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2020s 1.31 million current US$ per square kilometre 17.82 million current US$ per square kilometre 16.50 million current US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (current us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 19.34 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (current us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Luxembourg?
17.94 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Luxembourg?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Luxembourg rank globally for adjusted net national income (current us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 4th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Luxembourg: Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/luxembourg/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Luxembourg: Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 9,442 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.