Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific: Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
9.69 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
East Asia & Pacific
937,483 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Barbados rank
15th
East Asia & Pacific rank
12th

Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • East Asia & Pacific
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M197019952021

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 9.69 million current US$ per square kilometre against 937,483 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 8.75 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 10.3 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 15th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 12th of 183 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados East Asia & Pacific Difference Ahead
1980s 3.67 million current US$ per square kilometre 129,966 current US$ per square kilometre 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 4.74 million current US$ per square kilometre 222,642 current US$ per square kilometre 4.52 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 7.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 335,967 current US$ per square kilometre 7.18 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 9.46 million current US$ per square kilometre 707,229 current US$ per square kilometre 8.75 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 9.55 million current US$ per square kilometre 885,102 current US$ per square kilometre 8.67 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or East Asia & Pacific?
Barbados, at 9.69 million current US$ per square kilometre against 937,483 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and East Asia & Pacific?
8.75 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and East Asia & Pacific?
36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
How do Barbados and East Asia & Pacific rank globally for adjusted net national income (current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 15th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 12th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific: Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/east-asia-and-pacific/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/east-asia-and-pacific/">Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific: Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 9,442 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.