Mauritius vs OECD members: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Mauritius
0.894 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
OECD members
0.7147 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Mauritius rank
18th
OECD members rank
18th

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Mauritius
  • OECD members
12345197019952021

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.894 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7147 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in OECD members, a difference of 0.1793 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 18th and OECD members ranks 18th of 151 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 2.6 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.58 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0217 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
1980s 2.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.74 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2771 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
1990s 1.38 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.11 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2658 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
2000s 1.23 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9517 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2737 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
2010s 0.8011 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7823 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0189 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
2020s 0.8852 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7386 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1466 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Mauritius or OECD members?
Mauritius, at 0.894 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7147 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in OECD members as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Mauritius and OECD members?
0.1793 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and OECD members?
46 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2021.
How do Mauritius and OECD members rank globally for adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Mauritius ranks 18th and OECD members ranks 18th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs OECD members: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/oecd-members/">Mauritius vs OECD members: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,339 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.