Korea vs Lithuania: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of

Korea
28 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2025
Lithuania
29 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2025
Korea rank
1st
Lithuania rank
2nd

Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of over time

  • Korea
  • Lithuania
010203040200120132025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 29 Percentage of median disposable household income against 28 Percentage of median disposable household income in Korea, a difference of 1 Percentage of median disposable household income.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Korea ahead.

Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 2nd of 3 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 27 Percentage of median disposable household income 23 Percentage of median disposable household income 4 Percentage of median disposable household income Korea
2010s 25.1 Percentage of median disposable household income 26 Percentage of median disposable household income 0.9 Percentage of median disposable household income Lithuania
2020s 25 Percentage of median disposable household income 21.83 Percentage of median disposable household income 3.17 Percentage of median disposable household income Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of, Korea or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 29 Percentage of median disposable household income against 28 Percentage of median disposable household income in Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of between Korea and Lithuania?
1 Percentage of median disposable household income, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Lithuania?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Korea and Lithuania rank globally for adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of?
Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 2nd of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Lithuania: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/korea/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/korea/lithuania-2/">Korea vs Lithuania: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits
Unit
Percentage of median disposable household income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
41 places, 934 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

This indicator measures the income of selected jobless families receiving Minimum Income benefits. Values are expressed both in national currency and as a percentage of the median disposable income in the country. When the country's poverty line is defined as a fixed percentage of the median disposable income, the normalization of benefit amounts in terms of the median disposable income allows measuring the gap between benefit entitlements and the poverty line. For instance, if the poverty threshold is 50% of the median disposable income, a value of the indicator of 30% means that benefit entitlements are 20 percentage points below the poverty line. Calculations for families with children assume 2 children aged 4 and 6 who do not use formal childcare.