Japan vs Lithuania: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of

Japan
42 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2024
Lithuania
29 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2025
Japan rank
4th
Lithuania rank
2nd

Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of over time

  • Japan
  • Lithuania
01020304050200120132025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 42 Percentage of median disposable household income against 29 Percentage of median disposable household income in Lithuania, a difference of 13 Percentage of median disposable household income.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.4 times Lithuania's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 4th and Lithuania ranks 2nd of 31 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 43.2 Percentage of median disposable household income 23 Percentage of median disposable household income 20.2 Percentage of median disposable household income Japan
2010s 43.5 Percentage of median disposable household income 26 Percentage of median disposable household income 17.5 Percentage of median disposable household income Japan
2020s 42.6 Percentage of median disposable household income 20.4 Percentage of median disposable household income 22.2 Percentage of median disposable household income Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of, Japan or Lithuania?
Japan, at 42 Percentage of median disposable household income against 29 Percentage of median disposable household income in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of between Japan and Lithuania?
13 Percentage of median disposable household income, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of?
Japan ranks 4th and Lithuania ranks 2nd of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Lithuania: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/japan/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/japan/lithuania-2/">Japan vs Lithuania: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits
Unit
Percentage of median disposable household income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
41 places, 934 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

This indicator measures the income of selected jobless families receiving Minimum Income benefits. Values are expressed both in national currency and as a percentage of the median disposable income in the country. When the country's poverty line is defined as a fixed percentage of the median disposable income, the normalization of benefit amounts in terms of the median disposable income allows measuring the gap between benefit entitlements and the poverty line. For instance, if the poverty threshold is 50% of the median disposable income, a value of the indicator of 30% means that benefit entitlements are 20 percentage points below the poverty line. Calculations for families with children assume 2 children aged 4 and 6 who do not use formal childcare.